Petitioner sought withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to file afresh; the High Court allowed the prayer and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file the same afresh.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Cr.MMO No. 218 of 2017 Decided on: 04.12.2017
| Sh. Mohan Lal | …Petitioner | |
|---|---|---|
| Versus | ||
| State of H.P. & Ors. | ...Respondents |
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting? No.
For the petitioner: Ms. Kiran Lata, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. J.S. Guleria, Asstt. A.G. for respondent No. 1. Mr. Manoj Bagg, Proxy Counsel, for respondent No. 2.
Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge (Oral)
Learned counsel, on instructions from the petitioner, seeks
permission to withdraw this petition, with liberty to file the same afresh. Prayer not opposed, hence, allowed.
aforesaid.
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan),
December 04, 2017
sanjeev
Sh. Mohan Lal
State of H.P.
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
