This disposal order noted that a prior 2011 constitutional petition by the petitioner had been complied with, thereby disposing of the present petition while reserving liberty to revive it if necessary. All pending applications were disposed of.
Present petition dismissed with liberty to revive; pending applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
COPC No.61 of 2017 Date of decision: 22.05.2017
Dharam Chand ..Petitioner Versus Sanjay Gupta . Respondent
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Acting Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge Whether approved for reporting?
For the petitioner: Ms.Archna Dutt, Advocate.
For the respondent: Mr.Anup Rattan, Mr.Romesh Verma, Additional Advocate Generals with Mr.Vikram Thakur and Mr.Neeraj K. Sharma, Deputy Advocate Generals.
Sanjay Karol, Acting Chief Justice (oral)
Mr.Neeraj K. Sharma, learned Deputy Advocate General, placed on record communication dated 3rd May, 2017, stating that the judgment dated 26th February, 2011, passed by this Court in CWP No.3087 of 2010, titled Dharam Chand vs. State of H.P. & Ors., stands complied with. As such, the present petition stands disposed of, reserving liberty to the petitioner to revive the same, if need so arises subsequently. Pending application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of.
( Sanjay Karol ) Acting Chief Justice May 22, 2017 ( Tarlok Singh Chauhan ) (vt) Judge
Dharam Chand
Sanjay Gupta
Sanjay Karol
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
