Petitioner did not press the COPC and it was disposed of with liberty to approach the Court again on the same cause of action if needed.
Liberty to approach the Court on the same cause of action.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA
COPC No. 158 of 2017 Date of Decision: 21.3.2018
| ____ Dr. Suresh Chander Negi …..Petitioner. Versus |
|---|
| Satish Kumar Sharma **....Respondent. ** |
| Coram: |
| The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Acting Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 |
| **For the Petitioner:**Mr. Dilip Sharma, Senior Advocate, with Ms. Nishi Goel, Advocate. |
| **For the Respondent:**Mr. B.M. Chauhan, Advocate. |
Sanjay Karol, ACJ. (oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner, under instructions, does not press the present petition at this stage. As such, present petition stands disposed of reserving liberty to the petitioner to approach the Court, on the same cause of action, if need so arises subsequently, as prayed for. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly.
( Sanjay Karol), Acting Chief Justice 21st March, 2018 ( Sandeep Sharma ), Manjit/vikrant Judge.
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
Dr. Suresh Chander Negi
Satish Kumar Sharma
Sanjay Karol
Sandeep Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
