The single Judge held that the appeal had become infructuous due to the passage of time and was accordingly dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CMPMO No. 484 of 2016. Decided on : 14th June, 2017.
______________________________________________________________
Smt. Saloni Manchanda ....Appellant.
Versus
Panda Manchanda …Respondents.
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Chander Bhusan Barowalia, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1
For the appellant : Mr. Anuj Nag, Advocate For the respondent : Mr. Vivek Sharma, Advocate.
Chander Bhusan Barowalia, Judge.
Learned counsel for petitioner states that with the passage
of time the petition has become infructuous, so he does not want
to press the same.
In view of the above, the present appeal is dismissed as infructuous. Pending application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of.
Be consigned to records.
(Chander Bhusan Barowalia) Judge
14th June, 2017(bhatt)
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition turned infructuous over time, warranting dismissal without engagement on merits.
Smt. Saloni Manchanda
Panda Manchanda
Chander Bhusan Barowalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
