The High Court clarified an earlier judgment by substituting a specific date and annexure regarding the invalidity of an order. The Civil Miscellaneous Petition was disposed of following this clarification.
Clarification issued to previous judgment; original application disposed of ex parte.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CWP No.420 of 2017
05.10.2017 Present: Mr. Shrawan Dogra, Advocate General, with Mr. M.A.Khan & Mr. Romesh Verma, Additional Advocate Generals, and Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General, for the petitioners.
Mr.M.L.Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent.
CMP No.3818 of 2017
We clarify our judgment dated 4.5.2017 to the extent that the words “order dated 21st August, 2015 (Annexure A-4), is held to be illegal” at page-2 are substituted with the words, “order dated 25th April, 2014 (Annexure A-1), is held to be invalid w.e.f. 21st July, 2014”. The application stands disposed of.
Copy dasti.
(Sanjay Karol), Acting Chief Justice 5th October, 2017 (Sandeep Sharma), (shankar) Judge
Sanjay Karol
Sandeep Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
