Amar Nath v. Tripta
Case brief
What is this about?
of 2017. 06.11.2017. Present: Mr.Pushpender…
of 2017. 06.11.2017. Present: Mr.Pushpender…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CMP(M) No. 1111 of 2017.
None for the respondents.
CMP (M) No.1111 of 2017.
Respondents despite service have not put in their appearance.
By medium of this application, the applicant/appellant has sought 91 days’ delay that has crept up in filing of the appeal. A perusal of the application, more particularly, the contents of para-2 thereof, would reveal sufficient cause which prevented the applicant/appellant from filing the appeal within the prescribed period of limitation. The averments contained in the application are duly supported by an affidavit of the applicant/appellant. Even otherwise, there is none to oppose the application. Accordingly, the application is allowed, delay of 91 days’ in filing of the appeal is condoned. Application stands disposed of.
RSA No. of 2017.
Appeal be registered.
Issue notices to the respondents, through ordinary process,
returnable on 08.01.2018 . Steps for service be taken within 2 days.
CMP No. of 2017.
Be registered.
Certified copy of the judgment passed by the learned trial Court be filed within four weeks. Application stands disposed of.
Henceforth, the case be listed before Additional Registrar
(Judicial) for service and completion.
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan), November 06, 2017. Judge. (krt)
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court