Dheeraj Sharma v. State of Hp
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner did not press the present petition; liberty granted to file afresh. Petition disposed of as withdrawn.
What did the court decide?
Liberty granted to file the petition afresh.
Petitioner did not press the present petition; liberty granted to file afresh. Petition disposed of as withdrawn.
Liberty granted to file the petition afresh.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
Cr.MP(M) No.1457/2016
Decided on : December 22, 2016
Dheeraj Sharma
…Petitioner
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh
…Respondent
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1 No
For the Petitioner : Mr. Anirudh Sharma, Advocate.
For the Respondent : Mr. R.S. Verma, Additional Advocate General for State.
Sanjay Karol, J . (oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner, under instructions, does not press the present petition, seeking liberty to file the same afresh on the same cause of action before the appropriate forum. Liberty granted. Petition stands disposed of as withdrawn.
December 22, 2016 (KS)
(Sanjay Karol), J.
Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
Dheeraj Sharma
State of Himachal Pradesh
Sanjay Karol
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court