This appeal was disposed of with permission for the appellant to approach the appellate authority. Pending applications were also disposed of, as limitation would not apply due to the appellant's pursuit of prior remedies.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA
CEA No.3 of 2016
Date of Decision: 07.05.2016
Commissioner of Central Excise ………Appellant. Versus M/s Himachal Wire Industries P. Ltd. …..Respondent.
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge . The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No.
For the Appellant : Mr. Rajiv Jiwan, Advocate.
For the Respondents : Nemo.
Sanjay Karol, Judge (oral)
It would be open for the appellant to approach the appellate authority, inviting its attention to the grounds raised in the present appeal. As such, present appeal is disposed of. Needless to add, since the appellant had been pursuing remedies here, limitation would not come in their way. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
Copy Dasti.
(Sanjay Karol), Judge.
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan) May 7, 2016 (KS) Judge.
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
Commissioner of Central Excise
M/s Himachal Wire Industries P. Ltd.
Sanjay Karol
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
