Sunil Kumar v. Hrtc
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP…
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
| CWP No.4926 of 2011 Date of decision :19.3.2015 |
|---|
| Sunil Kumar … Petitioner Versus |
| Himachal Road Transport Corporation … Respondent. |
Coram: |
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1 No.
For the Petitioner : Mr. Manohar Lal Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondent : Mr. Adarsh Sharma, Advocate.
Sanjay Karol, Judge (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner, under instructions, submits that petitioner shall be content if he is allowed to file a representation bringing out his grievances to the notice of the competent authority, to be decided in accordance with law, within a period of two weeks from today.
be considered on its merits, in accordance with law,
Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
…2…
within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt thereof, by affording adequate opportunity of hearing/representation to the petitioner and other effected/aggrieved party. Petitioner is at liberty to place additional material on record. Needless to add, the authority shall assign reasons while deciding the same, which shall be communicated to the petitioner. With the aforesaid observations, present petition stands disposed of, so also, pending applications(s), if any.
March 19, 2015 (KS)
(Sanjay Karol), Judge.
Sunil Kumar
Himachal Road Transport Corporation
Sanjay Karol
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court