Dismissed
Banti Devi v. State
Himachal Pradesh HCCWP/3198/2012
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CWP No.…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CWP No.…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH
SHIMLA
CWP No. 3198 of 2012 Date of Decision: 01.05.2015 Banti Devi ……Petitioner.
Versus
State of H.P. & others. …..Respondents.
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1 No.
For the Petitioner: Mr. L.S. Mehta, Advocate, for the petitioner.
For the Respondents: Mr. R.S. Verma, Addl.AG., with Mr. R.M. Bisht, Dy. AG., for respondents No.1 to 4.
Mr. Umesh Kanwar, Advocate, vice counsel, for respondent No.5.
Sanjay Karol, J (oral)
Despite opportunity afforded on 27.03.2015, rejoinder not filed. As such, right to file the same is closed.
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2
Hence, action of the statutory body cannot be faulted on the ground of bias.
(Sanjay Karol), May 1, 2015 Judge. (Purohit)
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the action of the statutory body regarding separation of the family of the private respondent can be faulted on grounds of bias.
Whether the income certificate issued by the authority can be said to be bad in law.
Whether the petitioner is allowed to file a rejoinder after the date of opportunity has passed.
Banti Devi
State of H.P.
Sanjay Karol
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court