COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CWP No.…
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to seek appropriate remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA
CWP No. 8336 of 2014-D Date of decision: 1.12.2014.
| Shanky Chaudhary State of H.P. & others |
Versus | ….Petitioner ...Respondent s |
|---|---|---|
| ________________________ Coram: |
________________ | _____________________ |
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 -
| _______________________ For the petitioner: |
________________ Mr. Suresh Advocate. |
________________ Kumar Thakur, |
|---|---|---|
| For the respondents: | Mr. Shrawan General with |
Dogra, Advocate Mr. Romesh Verma, |
| Mr. Anup |
Rattan, Additional |
|
| Advocate Ge | nerals and Mr. J.K. | |
| Verma, Deput | y Advocate General. |
_________________________________________________ Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Chief Justice (Oral)
Learned Counsel for the petitioner stated at the Bar that he may be permitted to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to seek appropriate remedy. Granted. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for, along with pending applications, if any.
(Mansoor Ahmad Mir) Chief Justice. December 1, 2014 (Tarlok Singh Chauhan) (hem lata) Judge.
1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
Shanky Chaudhary
State of H.P.
Mansoor Ahmad Mir
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
