Disposed
Rohit Kumar v. State of Hp
Himachal Pradesh HCCWP/2421/2014
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP…
What the court decided
AI extract
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No. 2421 of 2014. Date of decision: 24.11.2014
Rohit Kumar and another …..Petitioners Versus State of H.P. and others. ….. Respondents
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge
Whether approved for reporting? No.
For the petitioners: Mr.Dalip K. Sharma and Mr.Pardeep Kumar, Advocates.
For the respondents: Mr.Shrawan Dogra, Advocate General with Mr.Romesh Verma & Mr.Anup Rattan, Additional Advocate Generals & Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General for respondents-State.
Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Chief Justice (oral)
Learned counsel for the writ petitioners stated that the respondents-State have offered appointment to the petitioners and, therefore, he sought permission to withdraw the writ petition. Permission granted. However, it is made clear that the issue of seniority shall be governed by the judgment rendered by this Court in LPA No.170 of 2014 , titled as Shri Balak Ram vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and others , on 19.11.2014.
Copy dasti.
(Mansoor Ahmad Mir ) Chief Justice
November 24, 2014 (Tarlok Singh Chauhan) (Tilak) Judge
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Shri Balak Ram vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and othersReferred¶10
LPA No.170 of 2014, titled as Shri Balak Ram vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and others, on 19.11.2014
Rohit Kumar
another
State of H.P.
others
Mansoor Ahmad Mir
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court