Pano v. Hrtc Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
Court allowed condonation of delay in filing appeals. Notices issued to respondents were waived. Adjournment granted to seek instructions for further proceedings on FAO No. of 2014.
What did the court decide?
Condonation of delay in filing appeal allowed; adjournment granted for further instructions.
What the court decided
CMP(M) No.1512 of 2014
13.11.2014. Present: Mr.R.K. Sharma, Senior Advocate, with Ms.Anita Parmar, Advocate, for the applicants/appellants. Mr.Raman Jamalta, Advocate, for respondents No.1 and 2.
Issue notice to respondents No.1 and 2 at this stage. On asking, Mr.Raman Jamalta, Advocate, waives notice for the said respondents.
For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed and the delay in filing the appeal is condoned. The application stands disposed of accordingly.
FAO No. of 2014:
Appeal taken on Board. Register the same.
Issue notice to respondents No.1 and 2 at this stage.
Mr.Raman Jamalta, Advocate, waives notice for the said respondents. He prays for adjournment to seek instructions. Granted.
List on 28th November, 2014.
November 13, 2014 (Mansoor Ahmad Mir) (tilak/rkv) Chief Justice.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether condonation of delay in filing appeal is warranted.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Unknown Applicants/Appellants
- respondent
Unknown Respondents No. 1 and 2
Coram
Mansoor Ahmad Mir
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Himachal Pradesh HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- CMP.M/1512/2014
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court