This court disposed of three connected Civil Writ Petitions regarding the construction of roads and bridges. Finding assurances from authorities reliable and noting that construction had commenced, the court concluded that no further order was needed, advising petitioners to revive petitions if grievances arose.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
| CWP No. 7249 of 2010 a/w | ||
|---|---|---|
| CWPs No. 3826 & 4730 of 2011 | ||
| Decided on: 06.09.2013 | ||
| CWP No. 7249 of 2010 | ||
| Davinder Chauhan Jaita | …Petitioner. | |
| Versus | ||
| State of H.P. & others ............................................... |
.................. | …Respondents. ....................................................................... |
| CWP No. 3826 of 2011 | ||
| T.R. Jain | …Petitioner. | |
| Versus | ||
| Director General (RD&SS) & ............................................... |
others .................. |
…Respondents. ....................................................................... |
| CWP No. 4730 of 2010 | ||
| Residents of Paonta Sahib | …Petitioner. | |
| Versus | ||
| Union of India & others | …Respondents. |
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar, Chief Justice.
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice V.K. Sharma, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?
| For the petitioners: | Petitioners in person in CWPs No. 7249 of 2010 & 3826 of 2011. |
|---|---|
| Ms. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Avdocate, for the petitioner in CWP No. 4730 of 2011. |
|
| For the respondents: | Mr. Shrawan Dogra, Advocate General, with Mr. Romesh Verma & Mr. Anup Rattan, Additional Advocate Generals, and Mr. J.K. Verma & Ms. Parul Negi, Deputy Advocate Generals, for respondents- State. |
| Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Assistant Solicitor General of India, for Union of India. |
|
| Mr. Sumeet Raj Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No. 4 in CWP No. 7249 of 2010. |
A.M. Khanwilkar, C.J. (Oral)
After hearing counsel for the parties and perusing the statement made on affidavit by the State Authorities and as we find no reason to doubt the
correctness of the assurance given therein coupled with the fact that the concerned Authorities of Union of India have reported to have commenced the process of construction of the subject roads and bridges, referred to in the present proceedings and assure to complete the construction in right earnest, we are of the opinion that noting more is required to be done except to place on record that we hope that the construction and the maintenance work of the concerned roads and bridges will be completed expeditiously by the concerned Authorities. If any of the petitioner or any person affected has any grievance, will be free to take recourse to appropriate proceedings and including to revive the concerned petition by taking out a formal application for that purpose. The same can be considered on its own merits.
(A.M. Khanwilkar) Chief Justice
(V.K. Sharma ) Judge
September 6, 2013 ( karan / rajni )
Davinder Chauhan Jaita
T.R. Jain
Residents of Paonta Sahib
State of H.P.
Union of India
Director General (RD&SS)
A.M. Khanwilkar
V.K. Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
