Som Dutt v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court disposed of CWP citing prior judgment Uma Dutt Sharma. Ordered State to consider petitioner's tenure and adhoc service for increments/retiral benefits within two months.
What did the court decide?
Direction to respondents to consider petitioner's service tenure and adhoc service for benefits within two months.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP(T) No. 9533 of 2008 Decided on: 14.12.2010
Som Dutt
…Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P. and others
…Respondents
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1 .
| For the petitioner | : Mr. Vikas Bhardwaj, Advocate. |
|---|---|
| For the respondents | : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. |
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's case should be considered for service benefits including tenure, adhoc service, and regularization based on prior precedent principles.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Som Dutt
- respondent
State of H.P.
Coram
Rajiv Sharma
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Himachal Pradesh HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- CWPOA/9533/2008
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court