COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T)…
dismissed as infructuous due to intervening developments.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
CWP(T) No.: 8914 of 2008.
Decided on: 09.12.2010.
_________________________________________________________ Rup Lal. … Petitioner.
Versus
Himachal Road Transport Corporation Ltd. & others. … Respondents.
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J.
Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Mr. Dilip Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Adarsh Sharma, Advocate.
Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral) :
Mr. Dilip Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the present petition is rendered infructuous due to intervening developments. Consequently, the same is dismissed having become infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs.
(Rajiv Sharma), Judge.
December 09, 2010. (sck).
1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
Rup Lal
Himachal Road Transport Corporation Ltd.
Rajiv Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
