The petition was disposed of after the petitioner withdrew it with liberty to file an exhaustive petition challenging orders passed during its pendency, following the rejection of a related appeal.
Liberty to file an exhaustive petition granted; petition disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CWP(T) No. 7150 of 2008
05.10.2010 Present: Ms. Ranjana Parmar, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Vivek Thakur, Addl. Advocate General for the respondents/State.
During the pendency of this petition the appeal filed by the present petitioner stands rejected. Ms. Ranjana Parmar, learned counsel seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file an exhaustive petition assailing the orders which were passed during the pendency of this petition. Liberty granted. Petition stands disposed of accordingly.
(Sanjay Karol), Judge. October 5, 2010 (PK)
Petitioner
Respondents/State
Sanjay Karol
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
