Disposed
Satya Pal Sharma v. State
Himachal Pradesh HCCWPOA/7047/2008
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP (T)…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP (T)…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP (T) No. 7047 of 2008 with CWP (T) Nos. 7048 and 7080 of 2008
Date of decision: 6.10.2010
1. CWP (T) No. 7047 of 2008
2. CWP (T) No. 7048 of 2008
3. CWP (T) No. 7080 of 2008
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. Whether approved for reporting ?1 No
For the Petitioner (s) : Mrs. Ranjana Parmar, Advocate (in CWP (T) Nos. 7047 and 7048 of 2008) Mr. Puneet Rajta vice Mr. K.D. Shreedhar, Advocate (in CWP (T) No. 7080 of 2008) For the Respondents : Mr. Vivek Thakur, Addl. A.G. with Mr. Rajesh Mandhotra, Dy. A.G.
Sanjay Karol, Judge (oral):
According to the learned counsel for the parties, the matter in issue is squarely covered by the decision rendered by the Division Bench of this Court in CWP No. 1358 of 2008 (wrongly mentioned as CWP No. 1538 of 2008), titled S.S. Kutlehria and others versus State of H.P. and others,
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the Judgment ?
2
copy of which is taken on record. They further state that this order/judgment stands clarified and the directions issued therein also squarely apply to the instant cases.
( Sanjay Karol ), October 6, 2010. Judge. (GR)
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
S.S. Kutlehria and others versus State of H.P. and othersReferred¶14
CWP No. 1358 of 2008
Satya Pal Sharma and ors.
State of H.P. and anr.
Sanjay Karol
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court