Kewal Ram v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner prayed for parity in pay fixation based on a prior judgment. Court ordered disposal directing respondents to consider his case under the cited precedent within two months.
What did the court decide?
Respondents directed to consider petitioner's case for pay fixation parity within two months; pending applications disposed of.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
CWP No. 4340/2010
Decided on:5.8.2010.
Kewal Ram.
...Petitioner.
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh and another. ... Respondents.
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1
For the Petitioner : Mr. Inder Sharma, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. R.K. Sharma, Sr. Addl. A.G.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to parity in pay fixation as per the principles laid down in CWP No.319/1997 (Hira Lal case)
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Kewal Ram
- respondent
State of Himachal Pradesh
Coram
Kurian Joseph
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Himachal Pradesh HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- CWP/4340/2010
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court