Gopal Singh v. Hrtc
Case brief
What is this about?
Court disposed of multiple writ petitions regarding claims for 30% House Rent Allowance by H.R.T.C. employees posted at Delhi. Petitioners claimed discrimination. Directly referred the matter to the State Government for a representation and decision.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No. 2843 of 2009 with CPW Nos. 3070, 3158, 3159, 3160, 3161, 3162, 3163, 3172, 3186, 3187, 3188, 3216, 3217, 3218, 3219, 3220, 3221, 3222, 3224, 3225, 3242, 3243, 3244, 3245, 3249, 3266, 3268 of 2009 and 5300 of 2010.
Date of decision: 5.10.2010.
| 1. | CWP No. 2843 of 2009. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gopal Singh | vs. | H.R.T.C. | |
| 2. | CWP No. 3070 of 2009. | ||
| Jai Ram | vs. | H.R.T.C. | |
| 3. | CWP No. 3158 of 2009. | ||
| Krishan Gopal | vs. | H.R.T.C. | |
| 4. | CWP No. 3159 of 2009. | ||
| Ravi Kumar | vs. | H.R.T.C. | |
| 5. | CWP No. 3160 of 2009. | ||
| Roshan Lal | vs. | H.R.T.C. | |
| 6. | CWP No. 3161 of 2009 | . | |
| Rahul Bakshi | vs. | H.R.T.C. | |
| 7. | CWP No. 3162 of 2009. | ||
| Pawan Kumar | vs. | H.R.T.C. | |
| 8. | CWP No. 3163 of 2009. | ||
| Suresh Kumar | vs. | H.R.T.C. | |
| 9. | CWP No. 3172 of 2009. | ||
| Bachiter Singh | vs. | H.R.T.C. | |
| 10. | CWP No. 3186 of 2009. | ||
| Inder Raj | vs. | H.R.T.C. | |
| 11. | CWP No. 3187 of 2009. | ||
| Shyam Lal | vs. | H.R.T.C. | |
| 12. | CWP No. 3188 of 2009. | ||
| Raj Kumar | vs. | H.R.T.C. | |
| 13. | CWP No. 3216 of 2009. | ||
| Devender Kumar | vs. | H.R.T.C. | |
| 14. | CWP No. 3217 of 2009. | ||
| Naresh Chand | vs. | H.R.T.C. |
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether petitioners posted at Delhi in H.R.T.C. are entitled to 30% H.R.A. as per 5th Pay Commission recommendations.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Gopal Singh
- petitioner
Jai Ram
- petitioner
Krishan Gopal
- petitioner
Ravi Kumar
- petitioner
Roshan Lal
- petitioner
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Himachal Pradesh HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- CWP/2843/2009
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court