Nic v. Salamudeen
Case brief
What is this about?
Limited oral order where the high court rejected an insurers PIL arguing that the low claim value warranted no remand and dismissal would not set a precedent for other accidents.
What did the court decide?
The petition was rejected.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CMPMO No. 218 of 2004
Date of decision: 06.12.2010.
The National Insurance Co. Ltd.
…Petitioner.
Versus
Salamudeen and others
…Respondents.
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Deepak Gupta, J.
Whether approved for reporting?1 No.
For the petitioner: Mr. Deepak Bhasin, Advocate. For the respondents: None.
Deepak Gupta, J. (Oral)
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Insurers claim for assessment of damages is sustainable.
Whether a remand to the trial Court for reassessment of the quantum is warranted.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
The National Insurance Co. Ltd.
- respondent
Salamudeen
Coram
Deepak Gupta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Himachal Pradesh HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- CMPMO/218/2004
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court