The Court dismissed a constitutional writ petition challenging the petitioner's posting. Relying on the fact that the petitioner had completed more than two years at the present place of posting, the Court held that it would not exercise its extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
The petition is dismissed. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CWP (T) No.1654 of 2008
3.11.2009 Present: Mr. Lokinder Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. R.K. Sharma, Senior Additional Advocate General with Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General for respondents No.1 to 3.
The petitioner had already completed two years and
four months at the present place of posting. In these circumstances, this Court will not exercise its extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
Accordingly, there is no merit in the present petition and
the same is dismissed. No costs.
(R.B. Misra), ACJ.
(Rajiv Sharma), J.
November 3, 2009. (rkv)
1 issue framed by the court
The question of whether the Court should exercise its jurisdiction to reconsider the placement of the petitioner.
Petitioner
Respondents No.1 to 3
R.B. Misra
Rajiv Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
