Allowed

Vikas Ajinath Bade v. State of Gujarat

Gujarat HC8 Sept 2026SCR.A/13073/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The single-judge High Court of Gujarat allowed an application filed by Vikas Ajinath Bade seeking regularization of his late surrender by five days. The Court permitted regularization due to the applicant's ill health and his actual surrender to jail authorities.

What did the court decide?

The period of late surrender of five days is regularized, and the rule in the application is made absolute.

Vikas Ajinath Bade Vs State of Gujarat — Bail and Remand | Gujarat HC (2026)

¶1

R/SCR.A/13073/2026 (GJHC240668532026) ORDER DATED: 08/09/2026

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION (REGULARIZED DAY OF LATE SURRENDER) NO. 13073 of 2026

¶3

================================================================ VIKAS AJINATH BADE

¶4

Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.

¶5

================================================================

¶6

Appearance:

¶7

MR DIPESH D SONI(9996) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 MR RONAK RAVAL, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1

¶8

================================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SANJEEV J.THAKER

¶10

Date : 08/09/2026 ORAL ORDER

¶11

Present application is filed by the applicant seeking regularization of period of late surrender by 5 days.

¶12

Rule. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor waives service.

¶13

Heard, learned advocate for the applicant and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent - State.

¶14

The learned advocate for the applicant submitted that the applicant could not surrender in time because of ill health and accordingly, he urges to regularize the period of his late surrender, to which, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed to.

¶15

Page 1 of 2

¶16

R/SCR.A/13073/2026 (GJHC240668532026) ORDER DATED: 08/09/2026

¶17

Having heard and considering the averments made in the application, more particularly the ground mentioned in the application, as also, considering the period of late surrender and the fact that the applicant himself had surrendered before the concerned jail authority, this Court is inclined to exercise discretion in favour of the applicant. This application is allowed, accordingly. The period of late surrender, as aforesaid, is hereby regularized. Rule is made absolute, accordingly.

¶18

(SANJEEV J.THAKER,J)

¶19

Manoj Kumar Rai

¶20

Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge. Digitally signed by: MANOJKUMAR RAI(HC01072), PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 08/09/2026 14:16:44

¶21

Page 2 of 2

Vikas Ajinath Bade v. State of Gujarat

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vikas Ajinath Bade v. State of Gujarat

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases