The applicant sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application, as the matter had already been heard by the designated Court. The request was granted and the application disposed of as withdrawn without expressing an opinion on merits.
Permission to withdraw the application granted; application disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
R/CR.MA/19497/2026 (GJHC240613532026) ORDER DATED: 03/09/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL) NO. 19497 of 2026
========================================================== NITESH VIJAY KHAWANI
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
========================================================== Appearance:
RONITH JOY(9560) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 MR RAJESH K KANANI(2157) for the Respondent(s) No. 2 MR TIRTHRAJ PANDYA, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SANJEEV J.THAKER
Date : 03/09/2026
ORAL ORDER
Learned advocate for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw this application, as the designated Court at Surat has already heard the matter.
Permission as prayed for is granted. This application is disposed of as withdrawn. It is clarified that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter.
(SANJEEV J.THAKER,J)
SRILATHA
Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge. Digitally signed by: SRILATHA VENKATARAO UPADHYAYULA(HC00185), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 03/09/2026 16:07:11
Page 1 of 1
NITESH VIJAY KHAWANI
STATE OF GUJARAT
SANJEEV J.THAKER
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
