The Tax Appeal was disposed of as not pressed. The appellant sought permission to withdraw the appeal in pursuance of the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme without the Court expressing any opinion on the merits of the substantial question of law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C/TAXAP/69/2016 ORDER DATED: 08/02/2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/TAX APPEAL NO. 69 of 2016
==========================================================
M/S MARUTI DEVELOPERS
Versus
INCOME TAX OFFICER
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR B S SOPARKAR(6851) for the Appellant(s) No. 1 MRS KALPANAK RAVAL(1046) for the Opponent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA
and
HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE NISHA M. THAKORE
Date : 08/02/2022
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA)
Page 1 of 2
C/TAXAP/69/2016 ORDER DATED: 08/02/2022
appeal stands disposed of accordingly.
(J. B. PARDIWALA, J)
(NISHA M. THAKORE,J) A. B. VAGHELA
Page 2 of 2
M/s Maruti Developers
Income Tax Officer
J B Pardiwala
Nisha M Thakore
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
