An applicant withdrew the present special criminal application without pressing it at the stage, with liberty to file a fresh petition later if required.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
R/SCR.A/224/2020 ORDER DATED: 18/02/2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 224 of 2020
==========================================================
PREMGIRI DEVGIRI GOSWAMI
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT
========================================================== Appearance:
MR KISHAN RATHOD, ADVOCATE for MR ASHISH M DAGLI(2203) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 for the Respondent(s) No. 2,3,4 MS M D MEHTA, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NIKHIL S. KARIEL
Date : 18/02/2022 ORAL ORDER
Learned Advocate Mr. Kishan Rathod for learned Advocate Mr. Ashish M. Dagli for the applicant does not press the present petition at this stage with liberty to file a fresh petition for the same cause of action if required in future.
Having regard to the same, the present petition stands disposed of as not pressed, with the liberty as requested for.
(NIKHIL S. KARIEL,J)
BDSONGARA
Page 1 of 1
Premgiri Devgiri Goswami
State of Gujarat
Nikhil S. Kariel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
