Petitioner sought parole to demonstrate financial arrangements for a PMAY flat in another party's name. The division bench previously rejected a temporary parole. The court rejected the plea noting mismatched ownership and the admitted appeal.
Petition for parole leave is rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
R/SCR.A/13127/2022 ORDER DATED: 14/12/2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 13127 of 2022
================================================================
KISHORPARI @ TRILOKPARI GAJRAJPARI GOSWAMI THRO GOSWAMI MINABEN TRILOKPARI
Versus STATE OF GUJARAT
================================================================ Appearance:
PARTY IN PERSON(5000) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 for the Respondent(s) No. 2,3
MR HARDIK MEHTA, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the Respondent(s) No. 1
================================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE GITA GOPI
Date : 14/12/2022
ORAL ORDER
Page 1 of 2
R/SCR.A/13127/2022 ORDER DATED: 14/12/2022
Sd/- (GITA GOPI, J)
CAROLINE
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether parole leave can be granted for a petitioner whose stated ground involves a flat in a scheme where ownership is with another person, and where a related appeal has already been admitted?
KISHORPARI @ TRILOKPARI GAJRAJPARI GOSWAMI THRO GOSWAMI MINABEN TRILOKPARI
STATE OF GUJARAT
GITA GOPI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
