In an oral order rejected the applicant's petition for parole leave on the ground of winter crop cultivation, noting that no cogent reason existed as family members were available, citing land records.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
R/SCR.A/12876/2022 ORDER DATED: 09/12/2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 12876 of 2022
================================================================
MAHENDRABHAI PRABHATBHAI PARMAR
Versus STATE OF GUJARAT
================================================================ Appearance:
THROUGH JAIL for the Applicant(s) No. 1 for the Respondent(s) No. 2,3
MR HARDIK MEHTA, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the Respondent(s) No. 1
================================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE GITA GOPI
Date : 09/12/2022
ORAL ORDER
Page 1 of 2
R/SCR.A/12876/2022 ORDER DATED: 09/12/2022
Sd/- (GITA GOPI,J)
CAROLINE
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether parole leave should be granted for the purpose of winter crop cultivation.
MAHENDRABHAI PRABHATBHAI PARMAR
STATE OF GUJARAT
GITA GOPI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
