The court granted permission to the petitioner to withdraw the special civil application held to be infructuous. The application was disposed of as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the writ application as having become infructuous was granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C/SCA/8760/2022 ORDER DATED: 20/07/2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8760 of 2022
=====================================================
ICICI BANK LTD.
Versus
DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, AHMEDABAD
=====================================================
Appearance:
MR VISHAL P GORI(10350) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1
MR SUDHANSHU A JHA(8345) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1
MS NIDHI VYAS, AGP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
=====================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE VAIBHAVI D. NANAVATI
Date : 20/07/2022
ORAL ORDER
Mr. Sudhanshu A. Jha, the learned advocate
appearing for the writ applicant seeks permission to
withdraw the present writ application as having
become infructuous.
Permission as prayed for is granted. The present
writ application stands disposed of as withdrawn.
(VAIBHAVI D. NANAVATI,J)
Pallavi
Page 1 of 1
ICICI BANK LTD.
DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, AHMEDABAD
VAIBHAVI D. NANAVATI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court