Single judge disposed of a writ petition as infructuous due to subsequent developments submitted by the petitioner's counsel.
Disposed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C/SCA/8444/2022 ORDER DATED: 24/06/2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8444 of 2022
==========================================================
KAVISHA INFRACON THROUGH ITS PARTNER RAMESHCHANDRA KANTILAL PATEL
Versus
PANKAJ KUMAR GUPTA
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR CP CHAMPANERI(5920) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1 for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. SUPEHIA
Date : 24/06/2022
ORAL ORDER
In view of the subsequent development, learned advocate Mr.Champaneri, appearing for the petitioner has submitted that the prayers made in this writ petition would not survive since the matter has become infructuous.
In view of the above, the writ petition stands disposed of as having become infructuous.
(A. S. SUPEHIA, J)
MAHESH BHATI/24
Page 1 of 1
Kavisha Infracon, through its partner Rameshchandra Kantilal Patel
Pankaj Kumar Gupta
A.S. Supehia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
