The High Court at Ahmedabad disposed of Special Civil Application No. 393 of 2022 with the permission of the petitioner's advocate. The petition was withdrawn by the petitioner to approach the concerned authority.
Petition disposed as withdrawn; notice discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C/SCA/393/2022 ORDER DATED: 06/12/2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 393 of 2022
==========================================================
VIPULBHAI RAJESHBHAI PAGI (THAKOR) THROUGH RAJESHBHAI BABUBHAI PAGI (THAKOR)
Versus STATE OF GUJARAT
==========================================================
Appearance: MR AN PATEL(597) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1 MS DHWANI TRIPATHI, ASST GOVERNMENT PLEADER for the Respondent(s) No. 1 MR AD OZA(515) for the Respondent(s) No. 5 MR UM SHASTRI(830) for the Respondent(s) No. 2 MS TASNIM A ZABUAWALA(10756) for the Respondent(s) No. 4 NOTICE SERVED for the Respondent(s) No. 3
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIREN VAISHNAV
Date : 06/12/2022
ORAL ORDER
Learned advocate for the petitioner seeks
permission and is permitted to withdraw the present petition with a view to approach the concerned authority for the relief prayed in the present petition. Petition stands disposed of as having been withdrawn. Notice is discharged.
(BIREN VAISHNAV, J)
DIVYA
Page 1 of 1
VIPULBHAI RAJESHBHAI PAGI (THAKOR) THROUGH RAJESHBHAI BABUBHAI PAGI (THAKOR)
STATE OF GUJARAT
BIREN VAISHNAV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
