Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ application as the entire amount was deposited by the respondent-consumer. Court granted permission to withdraw.
Permission to withdraw the writ application is granted; notice is discharged; permission to revive in case of difficulties is given.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C/SCA/2642/2018 ORDER DATED: 02/05/2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2642 of 2018
=====================================================
DEPUTY ENGINEER,(O AND M)
Versus
MOHMED SHAFIQ ABDUL RAHIM SHAIKH & 1 other(s)
=====================================================
Appearance:
MS LILU K BHAYA(1705) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1
DS AFF.NOT FILED (N) for the Respondent(s) No. 1
GOVERNMENT PLEADER for the Respondent(s) No. 2
=====================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE VAIBHAVI D. NANAVATI
Date : 02/05/2022
ORAL ORDER
Ms. Lilu Bhaya, learned advocate appearing for
the writ applicant upon instructions of her client
seeks permission to withdraw the present writ
application, in view of the fact that the entire
amount has been deposited by the respondent-consumer.
Permission to withdraw the present writ
application, as prayed for is granted. The present
writ application stands disposed of as withdrawn.
Notice is discharged. Permission to revive in case of
any difficulties.
(VAIBHAVI D. NANAVATI,J)
Pallavi
Page 1 of 1
DEPUTY ENGINEER,(O AND M)
MOHMED SHAFIQ ABDUL RAHIM SHAIKH
VAIBHAVI D. NANAVATI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court