The High Court of Gujarat on an oral order directed the respondent Collector to dispose of pending appeals by deciding the petitioner's representation within eight weeks and disposed of the special civil application.
Directed the respondent No.2 to decide the petitioner's representation within eight weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C/SCA/23179/2022 ORDER DATED: 01/12/2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 23179 of 2022
==========================================================
ASHWINBHAI CHAGGANBHAI KALSARIYA
Versus STATE OF GUJARAT
==========================================================
Appearance:
DHRUVIL G MERCHANT(9004) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1,2,3 J P KATIRA(9007) for the Petitioner(s) No. 3.1,3.2,3.3,3.4,3.5 for the Respondent(s) No. 2,3,4
MS DHWANI TRIPATHI, AGP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIREN VAISHNAV
Date : 01/12/2022
ORAL ORDER
The only prayer made in this petition is to decide the Appeal
Nos.257 and 258 of 2017 pending before respondent – Collector within a period of six weeks.
The respondent No.2 is directed to decide the representation of the petitioner within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order.
With the above direction, the petition stands disposed of.
Direct Service is permitted.
(BIREN VAISHNAV, J)
VATSAL
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to a direction to decide outstanding appeals against penalty orders.
ASHWINBHAI CHAGGANBHAI KALSARIYA
STATE OF GUJARAT
BIREN VAISHNAV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
