Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the special civil application. The court granted permission to withdraw and dismissed the petition as withdrawn. No substantive legal principles were discussed.
Permission to withdraw the petition granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C/SCA/20806/2022 ORDER DATED: 18/10/2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 20806 of 2022
===============================================================
JASMIN SHASHIKANT MAKADIA (HUF) Versus
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 1(1)(1), VADODARA
===============================================================
Appearance:
MR TUSHAR HEMANI, LD.SR.ADV WITH MS VAIBHAVI K PARIKH(3238) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1 for the Respondent(s) No. 1
===============================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.V.ANJARIA
and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA
Date : 18/10/2022
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.V.ANJARIA)
Learned Senior Advocate Mr.Tushar Hemani with learned advocate Ms.Vaibhavi K. Parikh for the petitioner, upon instructions, seeks permission to withdrawn the petition.
Permission is granted. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(N.V.ANJARIA, J)
(BHARGAV D. KARIA, J)
PALAK
Page 1 of 1
JASMIN SHASHIKANT MAKADIA (HUF)
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 1(1)(1), VADODARA
N.V.ANJARIA
BHARGAV D. KARIA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
