Petitioner appeared but did not press the petition, keeping contentions open for appropriate proceedings. Court disposed of the petition without entering into merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C/SCA/19332/2022 ORDER DATED: 04/10/2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 19332 of 2022
==========================================================
SHILPABEN MANISHBHAI AMIN
Versus
INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(2)(1), AHMEDABAD
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR ASHUTOSH S DAVE(8865) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1 ROHANKUMAR M AMIN(8851) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1 for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.V.ANJARIA
and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA
Date : 04/10/2022
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.V.ANJARIA)
Learned advocate Mr.Ashutosh Dave with learned advocate Mr.R.M. Amin does not press the present petition stating that all the contentions in relation to the controversy may be kept open to be agitated in the appropriate proceedings.
It is so observed and the petition is accordingly disposed of without entering into merits of the case.
(N.V.ANJARIA, J)
(BHARGAV D. KARIA, J)
Manshi
Page 1 of 1
SHILPABEN MANISHBHAI AMIN
INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(2)(1), AHMEDABAD
N.V.ANJARIA
BHARGAV D. KARIA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
