Petitioner sought permission to withdraw special civil application to utilize alternative remedy under the RTI Act. The Court granted the request, clarified that merits were not examined, and disposed of the matter as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C/SCA/17335/2022 ORDER DATED: 09/09/2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 17335 of 2022
==========================================================
RAJESHKUMAR UMIYASHANKER MEHTA
Versus STATE OF GUJARAT
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR RM PARMAR(591) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1 for the Respondent(s) No. 2,3,4 MR. HARDIK MEHTA, AGP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NIRZAR S. DESAI
Date : 09/09/2022
ORAL ORDER
Learned advocate Mr. R. M. Parmar for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition with the view to avail the alternative remedy provided to the petitioner under the provisions of RTI Act.
Permission as prayed for is granted.
It is clarified that this Court has not gone into the merits of the matter and withdrawal of this petition shall not come in way of the petitioner in pursuing the alternative remedy.
With the aforesaid observations, the present petition stands disposed of as withdrawn.
(NIRZAR S. DESAI,J)
VARSHA DESAI
Page 1 of 1
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner can withdraw the petition to avail alternative remedy under RTI Act.
Whether the Court can permit withdrawal without expending initial judicial time.
RAJESHKUMAR UMIYASHANKER MEHTA
STATE OF GUJARAT
NIRZAR S. DESAI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
