The High Court dismissed the letters patent appeal because the learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the appeal would not be pressed in light of the Single Judge's observations in the lower order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C/LPA/34/2022 ORDER DATED: 24/11/2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 34 of 2022
In R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8182 of 2021
==================================================
DEVSHREE REALTY
Versus
SURAT URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
==================================================
Appearance :
MAYANK K TRIVEDI(7906) for the Appellant(s) No. 1 MR KK TRIVEDI(934) for the Appellant(s) No. 1 MR.MANAN MEHTA, AGP for the Respondent(s) No. 2 MR HS MUNSHAW(495) for the Respondent(s) No. 1 NOTICE SERVED for the Respondent(s) No. 2
==================================================
CORAM : HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR
and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH J. SHASTRI
Date : 24/11/2022
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR)
Learned counsel appearing for the appellant would fairly
submit that in view of the observations made by the learned Single Judge in paragraph No.5.3 of the order dated 24.12.2021 in Special Civil Application No.8182 of 2021 he would not press the appeal. Placing his submission on record, appeal stands dismissed as not pressed.
Page 1 of 2
C/LPA/34/2022 ORDER DATED: 24/11/2022
Pending applications, if any, stand consigned to records.
(ARAVIND KUMAR, C.J.)
(ASHUTOSH J. SHASTRI, J.)
DHARMENDRA KUMAR
Page 2 of 2
Devshree Realty
Surat Urban Development Authority
Aravind Kumar
Ashutosj J. Shastri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
