The High Court at Ahmedabad granted permission to the applicant to withdraw the Civil Revision Application. The court clarified that impugned observations under CPC Order-7 Rule-11 are prima-facie and will not preclude the suit trial on merits.
Permission to withdraw the Civil Revision Application granted. Application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C/CRA/303/2022 ORDER DATED: 15/07/2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 303 of 2022
==========================================================
BASIR AHMED MAHMAD SIDAT
Versus
MORARBHAI CHANABHAI AAHIR
==========================================================
Appearance:
MS MARIYA M DALAL(3957) for the Applicant(s) No. 1,10,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 for the Opponent(s) No. 1,2,3
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE
Date : 15/07/2022 ORAL ORDER
Heard Ms. Mariya Dalal, learned advocate for the applicants.
After some arguments, Ms. Dalal, learned advocate for the applicants, seeks permission to withdraw the present Civil Revision Application.
Permission is granted.
The present Civil Revision Application is dismissed as withdrawn.
It is made clear that the observations in the impugned order disposing of the application under Order-7 Rule-11 of the Civil Procedure Code are only prima-facie in nature and will not come in the way of the trial of the suit against the applicants and the suit will be decided on its own merits and in accordance with law.
(ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE, J.)
KAUSHIK D. CHAUHAN
Page 1 of 1
2 issues framed by the court
Whether permission to withdraw the Civil Revision Application should be granted.
Whether the observations in the impugned order under Order-7 Rule-11 CPC bar the trial of the suit on merits.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
BASIR AHMED MAHMAD SIDAT
MORARBHAI CHANABHAI AAHIR
ANIRUDDHA P MAYEE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
