Criminal miscellaneous application rejected because witnesses are being examined by the trial court judge. The application stands dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
R/CR.MA/11603/2022 ORDER DATED: 02/12/2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 11603 of 2022
================================================================
HAMID @ AMIN SIDIK PATHAN
Versus STATE OF GUJARAT
================================================================
Appearance:
DARSHAN M VARANDANI(7357) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 MR HARDIK MEHTA, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the Respondent(s) No. 1
================================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE GITA GOPI
Date : 02/12/2022
ORAL ORDER
As per the record, the witnesses are being examined by the trial Court Judge and the trial is proceeding.
In view of the above, this Court is not inclined to entertain the application and the same stands rejected. Rule is discharged.
Sd/-
(GITA GOPI, J)
CAROLINE
Page 1 of 1
HAMID @ AMIN SIDIK PATHAN
STATE OF GUJARAT
GITA GOPI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
