Special Criminal Application regarding illegal confinement. The Court noted respondent No.8 was present, had married respondent No.4, and was not in confinement. The petition was disposed of as devoid of substance.
Petition disposed of as no substance found.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
R/SCR.A/8877/2021 ORDER DATED: 07/12/2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 8877 of 2021
==========================================================
ABDUL RAZZAK MOHAMMED HAJI
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR. ALTAF Y CHARKHA(7271) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 DS AFF.NOT FILED (N)(11) for the Respondent(s) No. 2,3,4,5,6,7,8 MS JIRGA JHAVERI, APP (2) for the Respondent(s) No. 1 ==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.H.VORA
and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE
Date : 07/12/2021
ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.H.VORA)
Page 1 of 2
R/SCR.A/8877/2021 ORDER DATED: 07/12/2021
abandoned her guardianship of her own and got married with respondent no.4. Even today, she has appeared before us of her own and stated that she is residing with respondent no.4.
(S.H.VORA, J)
(ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE,J)
SATISH
Page 2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether respondent No.8 Corpus was in illegal confinement.
Whether the present petition has any substance given the marriage.
Abdul Razzak Mohammed Haji
State of Gujarat
Corpus
Respondent No.4
S.H. Vora
Aniruddha P. Mayee
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
