In this Special Criminal Appeal, the High Court of Gujarat disposed of an applicant's plea regarding parole leave. The Court noted the parole application was pending before the District Magistrate and directed it to be decided within three weeks. The order ruled that the present application was premature.
Paragraph 4
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
R/SCR.A/1846/2021 ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1846 of 2021
==========================================================
MAMAD ALIMAMAD SAMA
Versus STATE OF GUJARAT
========================================================== Appearance:
MR. HARDIK Y KOTHARI(6895) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 for the Respondent(s) No. 2,3 MR. RONAK RAVAL, APP (2) for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A. P. THAKER
Date : 15/02/2021
ORAL ORDER
Page 1 of 2
R/SCR.A/1846/2021 ORDER
three weeks from today.
(DR. A. P. THAKER, J)
SAJ GEORGE
Page 2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should intervene in the pendency of the parole application before the District Magistrate so that the applicant is not kept in judgment detention.
How to direct the District Magistrate to decide the pending parole application within a specific timeline.
MAMAD ALIMAMAD SAMA
STATE OF GUJARAT
DR. A. P. Thaker
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
