This court issued an oral order directing the respondent to decide the petitioner's representation regarding recruitment as a Mukhya Sevika within statutory timelines, while reserving the final decision on merits for the respondent.
Direction to decision the petitioner's representation regarding Mukhya Sevika recruitment by 31.3.2021.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C/SCA/2557/2021 ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2557 of 2021
======================================================= PATEL RADHABEN DHANSUKHBHAI
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT
======================================================= Appearance:
MR. MAULIK M SONI(7249) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1 for the Respondent(s) No. 2,3,4 MR KRUTIK PARIKH AGP (99) for the Respondent(s) No. 1
=======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.G.URAIZEE
Date : 10/02/2021
ORAL ORDER
petitioner and Mr. Krutik Parikh, learned AGP for the respondent State.
that present petition may be disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2 to consider and decide the representation dated 12.1.2021 of the petitioner as expeditiously as possible in accordance with law.
Page 1 of 2
C/SCA/2557/2021 ORDER
(i) The respondent No. 2 shall decide the representation dated 12.1.2021 of the petitioner as expeditiously as possible but not later than 31.3.2021 in accordance with law and under the prevailing rules for recruitment in the cadre of Mukhya Sevika from amongst the Anganwadi Workers.
With above direction, the petition stands disposed of. It is clarified that this Court has not examined the merits of the case and the respondent No. 2 shall decide the representation of the petitioner on its own merits without being influenced by present order.
(A.G.URAIZEE, J)
SURESH SOLANKI
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a direction should be issued for the respondent to decide the petitioner's representation on recruitment expeditiously?
PATEL RADHABEN DHANSUKHBHAI
STATE OF GUJARAT
A.G. URAIZEE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
