This is an oral order where the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad disposed of multiple first appeals (R/First Appeal No. 2091 of 2000, etc.) for want of prosecution, as neither the appellants nor the respondent appeared before the court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C/FA/2091/2000 ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 2091 of 2000 With R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 2092 of 2000 With R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 2093 of 2000 With R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 2094 of 2000 With R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 2095 of 2000 With R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 2097 of 2000
========================================================== BARODA COTTON CORP. & 5 other(s) Versus PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK
========================================================== Appearance:
ADVOCATE NOTICE NOT RECD BACK(80) for the Appellant(s) No. 2,4 MR HARIN P RAVAL(708) for the Appellant(s) No. 5 NOTICE UNSERVED(8) for the Appellant(s) No. 1,2,3,4 ADVOCATE NOTICE UNSERVED(82) for the Defendant(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A. P. THAKER
Date : 05/02/2021
ORAL ORDER
When the matter was taken up twice, none is appearing for either side. This is an old matter. However, none is appearing for either side.
In that view of the matters, all the matters stand disposed of for want of prosecution. However, liberty is reserved for the concerned parties to approach this court in case of difficulty.
(DR. A. P. THAKER, J)
SAJ GEORGE
Page 1 of 1
BARODA COTTON CORP.
PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK
A. P. ThAKER
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
