This is an oral order disposing of a civil revision application. The court held the application infructuous due to developments after filing and disposed of it without notice.
Application disposed of as infructuous; notice discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C/CRA/212/2020 ORDER DATED: 25/11/2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 212 of 2020
==========================================================
ANAND KESHAVLAL SAVLA
Versus FALGUNI W/O. ANAND SAVLA D/O. PRAVINBHAI ANANDSHANKAR DAVE
========================================================== Appearance:
MR PREMAL S RACHH(3297) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 PARTY IN PERSON(5000) for the Opponent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIPUL M. PANCHOLI
Date : 25/11/2021
ORAL ORDER
Learned advocate Mr. Dhaval Kansara appearing for learned advocate Mr. Rachh for the applicant, under the instructions, submitted that in view of the development which has taken place after filing of the present application, the application has become infructuous.
In view of the aforesaid statement made by learned advocate for the applicant, application stands disposed of as having become infructuous. Notice discharged.
(VIPUL M. PANCHOLI, J)
LAVKUMAR J JANI
Page 1 of 1
ANAND KESHAVLAL SAVLA
VIPUL M. PANCHOLI
LAVKUMAR J JANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
