Application withdrawn by counsel as the applicant had died. The High Court of Gujarat rejected the application as not pressed, discharged the rule, and vacated ad-interim orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
R/CR.MA/7857/2015 ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 7857 of 2015
==========================================================
SARYUBEN BHARATBHAI SHAH
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT & 2 other(s)
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR MOUSAM R YAGNIK(3689) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 MR CHINTAN DAVE, APP (2) for the Respondent(s) No. 1 RULE SERVED BY DS(65) for the Respondent(s) No. 3
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ILESH J. VORA
Date : 12/02/2021 ORAL ORDER
Mr. Mousam Yagnik, the learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that pending the proceedings of this application, the applicant viz.Saryuben Bharatbhai Shah has died. Therefore, the learned counsel appearing for the applicant does not press this application, seeks permission to withdraw the same.
This application is rejected as not pressed. Rule is discharged. The ad-interim, if any, stands vacated forthwith.
(ILESH J. VORA,J)
A. B. VAGHELA
Page 1 of 1
Saryuben Bharatbhai Shah
State of Gujarat
Ilesh J. Vora
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
