Allowed

Hasmukhbhai Jitubha Parmar v. State of Gujarat

Gujarat HC23 Sept 2021CR.MA/10126/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Gujarat allowed three criminal miscellaneous applications seeking regular bail. The High Court fixed bail at Rs. 10,000 with one surety and imposed standard conditions including appearance before the investigation officer and not leaving India without permission. The order directs release pending investigation and trial.

What did the court decide?

Applicants ordered to be released on bail with Rs. 10,000 bond and one surety, subject to conditions of appearance and residence.

Hasmukhbhai Jitubha Parmar Vs State of Gujarat — Cheque Dishonour | Gujarat HC (2021)

¶1

R/CR.MA/8041/2021 ORDER DATED: 23/09/2021

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

¶3

R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 8041 of 2021

¶4

With R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 10126 of 2021 With R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 10271 of 2021

¶5

==========================================================

¶6

ASHABEN HIRENBHAI DHABBA

¶7

Versus STATE OF GUJARAT

¶8

========================================================== Appearance:

¶9

MR KANDRAP H DHOLKIA(3704) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 MR PB JANI(1633) for the Applicant(s) No. 1

¶10

MS MOXA THAKKAR, ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2) for the Respondent(s) No. 1

¶11

==========================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.H.VORA

¶13

Date : 23/09/2021

¶14

ORAL ORDER

¶15

Heard learned advocates for the applicants and learned APP, for the respondent-State.

¶16

The applications are filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for regular bail in connection with F.I.R. registered at C.R. No. 11202009210083/2021 with Jamnagar City "B" Division Police Station for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 420, 120(B), 114 of the IPC and u/s 3,4,5 of the GPID Act.

¶17

Heard and examined the papers placed for consideration in support of the submission made at bar.

¶18

Upon hearing submission, following picture emerges on

¶19

Page 1 of 3

¶20

R/CR.MA/8041/2021 ORDER DATED: 23/09/2021

¶21

record :-

¶22

(i) Charge sheet is filed. No any past antecedent is registered against the applicants. (ii) The entire incriminating material is in the custody of the investigating agency and therefore, there is no likelihood or possibility to tamper with the same.

¶23

(iii) The role attributed to the applicants are such that certain amounts were transferred to the accounts of the present applicants and further they were present at various meetings held to attract the investors to invest money in Om trading. The applicants are behind bar since March, 2021.

¶24

(iv) The applicants have deep root in the society, no apprehension as to flee away or escape trial or tempering with the evidence /witnesses is expressed. (v) In view of above position emerging at the end of hearing, the application deserves consideration, but by imposing suitable condition to be observed by the applicants, pending investigation and trial.

¶25

Hence, the applications are allowed and the applicants are ordered to be released on bail in connection with C.R. No. 11202009210083/2021 with Jamnagar City "B" Division Police Station, on executing a bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court and subject to the conditions that the applicants shall;

¶26

[a] not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty;

¶27

[b] not act in a manner injurious to the interest of

¶28

Page 2 of 3

¶29

R/CR.MA/8041/2021 ORDER DATED: 23/09/2021

¶30

the prosecution;

¶31

[c] not leave the territory of India without prior permission of the Sessions Judge concerned;

¶32

[d] appear before the Investigation Officer concerned, as and when required for investigation purpose and attend the Court concerned regularly.

¶33

[e] furnish the present address of residence along with the proof to the I.O. concerned and also to the Court at the time of execution of the bond and shall not change the residence without prior permission of Sessions Court concerned;

¶34

The competent authority will release the applicants only if the applicants are not required in connection with any other offence for the time being. If breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the Sessions Judge concerned will be free to take appropriate action in the matter. Bail bond to be executed before the lower court having jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the concerned Court to delete, modify and/or relax any of the above conditions in accordance with law. At the trial, the trial court shall not be influenced by the observations of preliminary nature, qua the evidence at this stage, made by this Court while enlarging the applicants on bail.

¶35

Rule made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct service is permitted.

¶36

(S.H.VORA, J)

¶37

SHEKHAR P. BARVE

¶38

Page 3 of 3

Hasmukhbhai Jitubha Parmar v. State of Gujarat

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hasmukhbhai Jitubha Parmar v. State of Gujarat

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

General Manager Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. Vs Patel Ambalal Vitthaldas

General Manager Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. Vs Manibhai Kachardas Patel

General Manager Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. Vs Lh of Decd Patel Govindbhai Chagandas

Ashaben Hirenbhai Dhabba Vs State of Gujarat

Narmada Ben Khodias Patel Since Decd.Thro His Heirs Vs Shantaben Himatlalw D/O Himatlal

Pravinbhai Chanabhai Zala Vs State of Gujarat