Order condoning a delay of 24 days in filing a Letters Patent Appeal by condoning the limitation period under Section 5 of the Limitation Act based on the facts averred.
Delay of 24 days is condoned and rule is made absolute.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C/CA/1796/2021 ORDER DATED: 22/12/2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1796 of 2021 In F/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 16385 of 2020
==========================================================
KALAVAD NAGAR PALIKA
Versus
DIWALIBEN DAYALJIBHAI BAGTHARIYA & 2 other(s)
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR DEEP D VYAS(3869) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 for the Respondent(s) No. 1,2,3
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.H.VORA
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE Date : 22/12/2021 ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.H.VORA)
Rule returnable forthwith. Learned advocate Mr. Vicky Mehta waives service of rule for the private respondent No.1 and learned AGP Ms. Urmila Desai waives service of rule for the respondent Nos.2 and 3.
By way of present application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, the applicant – original respondent No.4 seeks condonation of delay of 24 days caused in filing the captioned Letters Patent Appeal.
Considering the averments made in the application, delay of 24 days is condoned. Rule is made absolute.
(S.H.VORA, J)
(ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE, J.)
KAUSHIK D. CHAUHAN
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 24 days in filing the Letters Patent Appeal should be condoned.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
KALAVAD NAGAR PALIKA
DIWALIBEN DAYALJIBHAI BAGTHARIYA
S.H. VORA
ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
