The High Court at Ahmedabad permitted the withdrawal of criminal miscellaneous application N/CR.MA/4642/2020, granting liberty to file afresh if the trial is not completed within four months after reopening.
Permission granted to withdraw application with liberty to approach appropriate court if trial not completed within four months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
R/CR.MA/4642/2020 ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 4642 of 2020
==========================================================
NITESHKUMAR VIJAYKUMAR MISHRA
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR. KISHAN H DAIYA(6929) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 MR.KISHAN PRAJAPATI(7074) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 MS MAITHILI MEHTA, APP (2) for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A. P. THAKER
Date : 06/07/2020
ORAL ORDER
Heard Mr.Kishan Prajapati, learned advocate for the applicant and Ms.Maithili Mehta, learned APP for the respondent-State through video conferencing.
After making some submissions, learned advocate for the applicant, under the instructions, seek permission to withdraw present petition at this stage with a liberty to file afresh, in case the trial is not completed within specific time.
In view of above, permission sought for is granted with liberty to the applicant to approach appropriate Court, if the trial is not completed within four months of reopening of trial Court. Accordingly, present application is disposed of as withdrawn. Rule is discharged.
(A. P. THAKER, J)
RSMALEK/ MARY VADAKKAN
Page 1 of 1
NITESHKUMAR VIJAYKUMAR MISHRA
STATE OF GUJARAT
KISHAN PRAJAPATI
A. P. THAKER
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
