Special Civil Application became infructuous as the competent authority revoked the detention order, leading to the disposal of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C/SCA/6451/2019 ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6451 of 2019
=========================================================== NIRAJ @ DEEPAK S/O HARINATH @ HARILAL BIND THROUGH RAJESH S/O HARINATH BIND
Versus STATE OF GUJARAT
================================================================
Appearance:
MR. SURAJ A SHUKLA(7185) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1 DS AFF.NOT FILED (R)(71) for the Respondent(s) No. 1,2 MR. DHAWAN JAYWSAL, AGP, (1) for the Respondent(s) No. 3
================================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.Y. KOGJE
Date : 14/08/2019 ORAL ORDER
Learned A.G.P. makes a statement at the bar that the competent authority has revoked the order of detention and, therefore, the present petition has become infructuous.
In view of the aforesaid statement, the petition stands disposed of as having become infructuous. Rule is discharged.
(A.Y. KOGJE, J)
SIDDHARTH
Page 1 of 1
NIRAJ @ DEEPAK S/O HARINATH @ HARILAL BIND THROUGH RAJESH S/O HARINATH BIND
STATE OF GUJARAT
A Y Kogje
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
