Petitioner sought to place consent terms reached with Respondent No. 1 on record. The court accepted the terms and disposed of the petition as it did not survive.
Consent terms placed on record and the special civil application disposed of as it did not survive.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C/SCA/4656/2019 ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4656 of 2019
==========================================================
HENAROHITCHOVATIYA(PATEL)
Versus
AUTHORISED OFFICER & 4 other(s)
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR. MAULIK M SONI(7249) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1 for the Respondent(s) No. 2,3,4,5 MS NALINI S LODHA(2128) for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE BELA M. TRIVEDI
Date : 09/05/2019
ORAL ORDER
Learned advocate Mr. Maulik Soni for the
petitioner seeks permission to place on record the
consent terms arrived at between the petitioner and
the respondent No. 1, and further requests to dispose
of the petition accordingly. The learned advocate
Ms. Nalini S. Lodha appearing for the respondent No.
1 does not dispute the said position.
In view of the above, the said consent terms is
taken on record. The petition is disposed of as does
not survive.
(BELA M. TRIVEDI, J)
AMAR SINGH
Page 1 of 1
HENAROHITCHOVATIYA(PATEL)
AUTHORISED OFFICER
BELA M TRIVEDI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court